Thursday, July 29, 2010

Self-Assessment of My WOW Project Presentation








  • Organization of the presentation (flow, length, practiced). Presentation parts: Intro, Body, and Conclusion + References and Appendices.
    • I rehearsed my presentation numerous times and I believe that paid off during my presentation. I am pleased with the flow of my presentation and the fact that I gave an effective introduction, discussion of major content areas of the topic, and an effective conclusion. 
  • Topic stimulation (active engagement).
    • I believe I kept classmates engaged by periodically checking for understanding. I think my introduction helped get people thinking about the topic and the  links within the wiki page kept the discussion and materials moving, which helps keep people engaged. Also, the design of the wiki site is interactive by nature.
  • Usefulness of materials (clear, practical, handy, relevant, informative, handout(s), resources provided).
    • I believe my materials were very effective and useful. 
  • Knowledge of the topic (expertise, good ideas, insights).
    • I thought I did an effective job providing background information and summaries for the major concepts within my topic. I kept my speech conversational and avoided reading from my slides when I could. 
  • Scope of teaching ideas and curriculum impact (goals clear, important, appropriate, significant, doable).
    • I believe all of the technology tools I included are geared towards clear, important, appropriate, significant and doable classroom applications. 
  • Effort (digging deep, extensive depth displayed in the research and provided presentation, work-work-work-work, persistence).
    • This project reflects significant amounts of research and work. Hopefully that shined through during the presentation.
  • Audience involvement (Grabbers, Check for Understanding stops, activities, summative assessment tools, etc.) 
    • I started with an interactive introduction, checked for understanding multiple times, and provided an interactive summative assessment. 
  • References (APA style is followed).
    • All references were provided in the APA format. 

No comments:

Post a Comment